Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42095441›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026

Different approaches of SARC-tools for Sarcopenia Screening in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional validation study.

Alicia S Hartmann, João G Brum, Thiago G Barbosa-Silva, M Cristina Gonzalez, Juliessa Florian, Flávia M Silva

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alicia S HartmannFederal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7178-9968
João G BrumFederal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6440-4415
Thiago G Barbosa-SilvaDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-0814
M Cristina GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Nutrition and Food, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-8182
Juliessa FlorianPavilhão Pereira Filho, Santa Casa Hospital Complex, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Flávia M SilvaNutrition Department and Nutrition Sciences Graduate Program of Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-5424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to assess the concurrent and predictive validity of different screening tools for sarcopenia in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

methodsCross-sectional study with 124 community-dwelling adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (67.8 ± 8.4 years, 57.6% female). SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-CalF

resultsSARC-CalF

conclusionsSARC-CalF

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSarcopeniaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDyspneaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness Indexchronic obstructivedata accuracyprognosispulmonary diseasesarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID42095441
PMCPMC13350314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.