Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096049›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Subject: submission of manuscript entitled "integrating eTEP ventral hernia repair into bariatric surgery: technical insights and clinical outcomes from an institutional experience".

Pradeep Joshua Christopher, Saravana Kumar S, Akhilesh Manchala, Jayanth Leo Xl, Prabhakaran S, Praveen Raj Palanivelu, Palanivelu Chinnusamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pradeep Joshua ChristopherDepartment of AWR, Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Institute, 45, Pankaja Mills Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India. pdp.joshua@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-9652
Saravana Kumar SDepartment of AWR, Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Institute, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Akhilesh ManchalaDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jayanth Leo XlDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prabhakaran SDepartment of Anaesthesiology, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Praveen Raj PalaniveluDepartment of Obesity and Diabetes Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641045, India.
Palanivelu ChinnusamyInstitute of Gastroenterology & Minimal Access Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a well-established risk factor for ventral hernia, and concomitant repair during bariatric surgery offers the advantage of a single-stage solution. While the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique has been the traditional approach, the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair provides a biomechanically superior, retro-muscular alternative. However, its integration with bariatric surgery has not been previously described.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of integrating enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair into bariatric surgery and describing its technical nuances. Secondary objectives included reporting early hernia-related and metabolic outcomes.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 35 consecutive patients who underwent concomitant eTEP ventral hernia repair with bariatric procedures between July 2021 and January 2025. Of these, 23 underwent eTEP without transversus abdominis release (TAR) and 12 required TAR for posterior fascial closure. Bariatric procedures included laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB). Perioperative outcomes, complications, and follow-up data were analyzed.

resultsAmong 23 patients without TAR, 12 underwent LSG, 5 RYGB, and 6 MGB. Among the 12 TAR cases, 6 underwent LSG, 3 RYGB, and 3 MGB. The mean operative time was 157 ± 23 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3 ± 1 days. There were no intraoperative conversions or mesh-related infections. Two patients developed seroma managed conservatively. No hematomas, posterior rectus sheath ruptures, or recurrences were observed during a minimum follow-up of six months (mean 17 ± 3 months).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that concomitant eTEP ventral hernia repair can be safely integrated with bariatric surgery when performed in a standardized, contamination-safe manner. The detailed technical framework presented here provides a reproducible roadmap for surgeons adopting this approach in complex obese patients.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeAriatric surgeryConcomitant surgeryeTEPIPOM alternativeMetabolic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryTransversus abdominis release (TAR)Ventral hernia repair

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.