Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42096465›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Environmental uncertainty shapes human effort learning.

Rong Bi, Jan Grohn, Patricia L Lockwood, Miriam C Klein-Flügge, Lilian Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rong BiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8163-1864
Jan GrohnOxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (OxCIN), Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patricia L LockwoodCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Miriam C Klein-FlüggeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-9833
Lilian WeberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans show remarkable flexibility in adapting their behaviour to constantly changing environments. This flexibility relies on the ability to regulate motivation in response to changing motivational demands. Typically, the amount of effort required to achieve a certain goal is not precisely signalled by the environment but needs to be learnt from experience. By contrast, prior work examining motivated choices has usually directly instructed effort requirements. It therefore remains unclear how healthy individuals estimate and flexibly regulate effort and how they might achieve this in dynamically changing environments. In the current study, we examine how effort learning is shaped by different types of environmental uncertainty when motivational requirements are not explicitly instructed. Analogous to tasks in the reward learning domain, we designed a novel effort learning task that systematically manipulated two key sources of uncertainty: volatility and noise. Participants were asked to exert effort by squeezing hand-held dynamometers. We characterised effort learning across different stages of the effort production process (e.g., initiation of effort production, effort expectation, error-driven adjustment), which allowed us to capture the dynamics underlying effort estimation and regulation over time. Our findings reveal that humans are able to learn effort requirements by integrating both effort priors and sensorimotor feedback. We further show that effort learning is modulated by environmental statistics, with slower force initiation, weaker priors, slower learning, and faster within-trial force adjustments in high noise environments, but slower learning and slower within-trial force adjustments in high volatility environments. In summary, when effort information is not instructed, different sources of uncertainty about an action's required effort are integrated into participants' internal priors to flexibly guide effort exertion. Our work may provide a useful framework for understanding motivational disorders where abnormal effort learning and estimation may underlie the reduced willingness to exert effort for reward.

Indexed as

LearningMotivationAdultEnvironmentFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleRewardUncertaintyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42096465
PMCPMC13175491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.