ReviewThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2026
Global perspectives on central nervous system drug innovation: achievements, barriers, and priorities for the next decade.
Review in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, neuropsychopharmacology has shifted from stagnation to momentum, with first-in-class mechanisms and biomarker-enabled trials spanning psychiatry and neurology.
methodsWe narratively synthesized advances from 2013 to 2026 across central nervous system (CNS) discovery and development, including pivotal trials, regulatory actions, digital/real-world evidence, genetics, artificial intelligence (AI), and implementation/global-access themes that are endorsed by international societies.
resultsTherapeutic gains include rapid-acting drugs for treatment-resistant depression (intranasal esketamine); psychedelic-assisted therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression; neuroactive steroid γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptor positive allosteric modulators (brexanolone, zuranolone) for postpartum depression; non-dopaminergic muscarinic agonists (xanomeline-trospium) for schizophrenia; orexin receptor antagonists for insomnia; and anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (lecanemab, donanemab) for early Alzheimer's disease. Persistent barriers include high mid-/late-stage attrition that is driven by placebo effects, subjective endpoints, and preclinical-to-clinical gaps; regulatory and economic headwinds; and limited generalizability from tightly run trials. Emerging enablers include adaptive/platform designs, digital health technologies, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical outcome assessments, real-world evidence (RWE), AI/machine learning (ML), genetics for target de-risking and biomarker-guided stratification, and publicly accessible large CNS relevant biological datasets.
conclusionsTo convert momentum into durable progress, we recommend: (1) deeper academia-industry/stakeholder collaboration and sustained funding for high-risk/high-reward science from industry, governments, and non-for profit foundations; (2) modernized regulation (flexible evidentiary paths, novel endpoints, and clear guidance on adaptive/platform trials); (3) data-driven development integrating RWE, AI/ML, and precision medicine; (4) the adoption of Neuroscience-based Nomenclature; and (5) a global-access mandate with essential-medicine inclusion, equitable pricing/licensing, capacity building, tele-enabled mental health, and geographically diverse research. Aligning scientific innovation with implementation and equity can accelerate translation and ensure new treatments benefit patients worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.