ArticleNeurospine2026
Data-Driven Clustering for Risk Stratification of Unfavorable Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Development Study.
Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Lumbar fusion surgery serves as a crucial option for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, patient heterogeneity contributes to suboptimal surgical outcomes in a substantial proportion of cases. Therefore, an accurate classification may provide a powerful tool for personalized treatment and enable the identification of individuals at increased risk for unfavorable surgical outcomes (USO). The study aimed to develop a risk stratification model for USO using cluster analysis. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent lumbar fusion between April 2019 and January 2023 were enrolled. The outcome of interest was the USO, defined as failure to achieve a minimal clinically important difference in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary score, with the presence of complications. Three machine learning algorithms were employed to identify risk factors associated with USO. Based on these risk factors, we conducted a data-driven clustering analysis to develop a risk stratification model. Furthermore, based on 6 machine learning models, we developed a classification classifier capable of accurately identifying the risk cluster of individual patients. Results: A total of 662 patients were enrolled for risk stratification model, 219 patients were classified as having an USO. Six features were identified as key prognostic predictors, including frailty, depression, PI-LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) match, surgical levels, functional independence measure, and the relative functional cross-sectional area. The K-prototypes clustering algorithm successfully identified 3 distinct clusters. Furthermore, we developed a classification classifier, in which LightGBM (light gradient boosting machine) demonstrated the highest predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.814-0.974; area under the precision-recall curve, 0.927; 95% CI, 0.769-0.969). Conclusion: Based on data-driven clustering analysis, we developed a risk stratification model for predicting USO following lumbar fusion surgery, which demonstrated high predictive accuracy. Further studies in larger and more diverse cohorts are warranted to validate the clinical applicability of clustering analysis in USO risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.