ArticleNature communications2026
Enhancer placement impacts transcriptional dynamics in Drosophila embryos.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulators As Dynamic, Tunable Regulators of Enhancer-Promoter Coordination in LivingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The functional role of enhancer-promoter configurations in transcription regulation remains poorly understood, despite the wide range of linear genomic distance and relative enhancer positioning observed in endogenous contexts. While canonical models suggest that enhancers operate independently of genomic position, technical limitations have obscured insights on transcriptional kinetics. Here, we employ single-cell MS2/MCP-based live imaging in Drosophila embryos to systematically analyze transcriptional dynamics driven by sub-10kb enhancer-promoter arrangements. Kinetic analyses reveal that while linear enhancer-promoter distance moderately tunes transcriptional output, downstream enhancer positioning reduces mRNA output by 70%. Each configuration modulates distinct transcriptional parameters: linear distance governs initiation kinetics, while relative enhancer positioning dictates transcriptional active state stability. These effects are consistent across varied enhancer and reporter sequences, revealing configuration-dependent cis-regulatory element arrangement as an intrinsic mechanism for transcriptional fine-tuning. This work directly correlates enhancer-promoter configuration with a distinct transcription property for the first time and establishes a framework to dissect the interplay between genome architecture and transcription regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.