ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
An interpretable deep learning biomarker for prognostication and prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TIPE3 in Cancer: A Multifaceted Regulator of Tumorigenesis, Therapeutic Resistance, and Clinical Outcomes.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prognostic stratification in gastric cancer (GC) currently relies on the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system, which incompletely captures tumour heterogeneity. Routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) contain additional prognostic information that is not routinely quantified. We developed an interpretable deep learning framework using a weakly supervised Transformer to derive a pathological risk score (TPRS) from WSIs for overall survival (OS) stratification and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit prediction. TPRS was developed on HMU-GC (n = 2876) and validated internally (n = 288) and on TCGA-STAD (n = 355). It achieved a mean 10-fold cross-validation C-index of 0.765 ± 0.003 internally and 0.621 ± 0.005 externally, and was an independent prognostic factor. Stage III patients with high TPRS showed significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Mediation analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and cellular features in high-attention patches supported a 'Gene → Cellular Features → TPRS' relationship, linking transcriptomics to cellular features and TPRS.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.