ArticleScientific reports2026
Analysis of endophytic bacteria diversity between two species of genus Polygala with similar medicinal value.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polygala is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine, and research is needed to understand how biological approaches can be used to protect this widely cultivated plant. Here, we used high-throughput sequencing methods to understand the distribution of endophytic bacteria, which promote plant growth and act as a biological control in Polygala. We found that endophytic bacteria were most abundant in roots, followed by stems and then leaves in both medicinal plants. Diversity was highest in stems, followed by roots and then leaves in P. sibirica Linnaeus and in leaves followed by stems and then roots in P. crotalarioides Buchanan-Hamilton ex Candoll. OTUs were assigned to 23 phyla, with the phylum Gammaproteobacteria predominating. The main endophytes in the belowground parts of P. sibirica Linnaeus belonged to the genera Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia and Dyella, with the most common genus in aboveground parts identified as Candidatus Portiera. In P. crotalarioides Buchanan-Hamilton ex Candolle, the main genera in belowground plant parts included the genera Amycolatopsis, Dyella, Actinophytocola, Cupriavidus, and Mycobacterium, and the genera Methylobacterium, Novosphingobium, Sphingomonas, and Curtobacterium were the main genera in aboveground parts. This work represents the first report of endophytic bacteria associated with the two medicinal plants. It offers a new perspective to understand differences in quality between Polygala species and provides data to support better understanding of the mechanisms underlying plant-microbe interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.