ArticlePediatric research2026
Machine learning and SHAP-based risk assessment of PICC-related bloodstream infections in premature infants at the time of clinical suspicion.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeripherally inserted central catheter-related bloodstream infections (PICC-CRBSI) pose a serious threat to preterm infants. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for risk assessment of PICC-CRBSI at the time of clinical suspicion.
methodsA total of 490 preterm infants who underwent PICC insertion in a tertiary hospital NICU in China were prospectively enrolled from January 2024 to October 2025. After feature selection, prediction models were constructed using four machine learning algorithms. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. The optimal model was interpreted using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).
resultsCRBSI occurred in 68 patients (13.88%). The Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance, with AUC values of 0.973 and 0.934 in the training and validation sets, and overall accuracy of 0.945 and 0.905. SHAP analysis revealed that C-reactive protein(CRP), white blood cell count, and respiratory rate had the most significant influence on the model's predictive performance.
conclusionThe random forest model demonstrated robust performance for risk assessment of PICC-CRBSI in preterm infants at the time of clinical suspicion. These findings may support clinical risk stratification and provide hypothesis-generating insights into key factors associated with PICC-CRBSI. IMPACT: Develops a high-performance, interpretable random forest model for risk assessment of peripherally inserted central catheter-related bloodstream infection (PICC-CRBSI) in preterm infants at the time of clinical suspicion. Addresses a gap in the literature by integrating the SHAP method to transparently identify and prioritize key risk-associated features (e.g., C-reactive protein and white blood cell count), enhancing the clinical interpretability of the model. Provides a practical approach for risk stratification, with potential to support clinical assessment and improve the understanding of PICC-CRBSI risk in neonatal intensive care.
Identifiers
42098419What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.