SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2026
Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroesophageal reflux (GER) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are common in infants and children. Non-pharmacological approaches are widely used, but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This systematic review evaluates the current evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for pediatric GER and GERD.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following Cochrane methodology and PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251041380). We included randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions for GER or GERD in individuals aged 0-18 years. Eligible interventions included dietary modifications, positioning, alginates, probiotics, massage, and complementary therapies. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. Due to heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not conducted. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
resultsWe included 40 studies: 39 RCTs (15 crossover) and one systematic review. Most studies involved infants with uncomplicated GER or GERD. Interventions included dietary modifications (n = 25), probiotics (n = 3), alginates (n = 4), positioning (n = 6), and massage therapy (n = 2). Most trials reported regurgitation or Infant Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised as primary outcomes. Several interventions, especially thickened feeds, probiotics, alginates, and left lateral positioning, were associated with reduced regurgitation frequency. Risk of bias was frequently high, and GRADE certainty ranged from very low to moderate, depending on outcome and intervention type.
conclusionsThickened formulas and alginates showed the most consistent symptom improvement in infants with GER or GERD, though overall evidence quality was low to moderate. Other interventions yielded mixed results. Non-pharmacological strategies appear generally safe, but further high-quality research is needed to support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.