ReviewCureus2026
Application of Honey Dressing in the Management of Postoperative Wounds, Ulcers, and Burns: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Honey has served as a therapeutic agent for wound treatment across diverse cultures throughout history. Despite its extensive application, the evidence substantiating the efficacy of honey in wound treatment remains unclear. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the existing evidence and discern the role of honey in modern wound care, specifically targeting burns, ulcers, and surgical wounds. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, identifying 22 randomized clinical trial studies deemed eligible for inclusion. Across all three categories of wounds, honey has been identified as a dressing that shortens wound healing. This effect was especially observed in burns. Furthermore, both surgical wounds and burns exhibit evidence of the antibacterial effect of honey. The anti-inflammatory effect is distinctly evident in the realm of surgical wounds. Beyond these effects, honey is acknowledged for its potential deodorizing, debridement, and, notably, wound pain-reducing properties. However, it is essential to note that the evidentiary support for these attributes is relatively limited. Burns emerge as the lesions where honey demonstrates its utmost effectiveness, likely related to a combination of antibacterial and healing-promoting properties. If confronted with escalating antibiotic resistance, the proactive utilization of honey to mitigate wound infections presents itself as a plausible and strategic option. A potential area of particular interest for future studies could be the exploration of the aesthetic effects of honey on surgical wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.