Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42099432›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Axonal spike-count regimes link spinal cord stimulation periodicity to artificial sensory detection and discrimination in rodents.

Taylor J Tvrdy, Aditi Bhattacharya, Rahul Radhakrishna, Jacob C Slack, Amol P Yadav

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taylor J TvrdyLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aditi BhattacharyaMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Seewiesen, Germany.
Rahul RadhakrishnaLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jacob C SlackLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Amol P YadavLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-8006

Funding

Sensory Augmentation, Restoration, and Modulation Using a Spinal NeuroprosthesisDP2NS136872 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Amol P Yadav · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS136872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation is widely used to evoke artificial sensation, yet how temporal stimulation patterns are transformed into neural activity and perception remains poorly understood. Recent behavioral studies have shown that increasing the aperiodicity of spinal cord stimulation pulse trains alters both detection thresholds and discrimination performance despite constant pulse counts, suggesting a role for temporal structure beyond rate alone. However, the neural mechanisms underlying these effects remain unresolved. We developed a biophysically grounded computational framework linking a finite-element model of the rodent spinal cord, conductance-based axon simulations, and observer decision models to investigate how stimulation periodicity shapes neural responses and resulting behavior. By systematically varying stimulation amplitude, frequency, and inter-pulse interval variability, we identified distinct spike-count regimes arising from interactions between stimulation timing and axonal membrane dynamics. These regimes ranged from single spikes and small volleys to sustained spike trains, and they exhibited diverse frequency- and variability-dependent trends. No single regime was able to sufficiently explain experimentally observed detection threshold trends; instead, mixtures of regimes accurately reproduced both frequency-dependent threshold behavior and trial-level variability. Extending this framework to periodicity discrimination, we show that features derived from regime mixtures contain sufficient information to recover behavioral psychometric curves. Furthermore, observer model results provide a mechanistic account of behavioral asymmetries depending on the periodicity of the reference stimulus: discrimination relative to periodic inputs relied on combined rate and timing evidence, whereas discrimination relative to aperiodic inputs was dominated by timing irregularity. These results establish a mechanistic link between stimulation temporal structure, axonal spike generation, and perceptual behavior. This framework suggests that spinal cord stimulation does not operate within a single fixed neural regime but instead engages a spectrum of spike-count regimes whose mixtures shape perception. These findings have important implications for the design of biomimetic stimulation strategies, highlighting temporal patterning as a key dimension for controlling sensory outcomes.

Indexed as

aperiodic stimulationartificial sensationsaxonal spikescomputational modelspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42099432
PMCPMC13148113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.