ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The role of gut microbiota-immune-endocrine crosstalk in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoimmunological impacts of micro/nanoplastics: systemic translocation, inflammatory responses, and bone remodeling disruption.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a common metabolic bone disorder characterized by decreased bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture that result in increased bone fragility and fracture risk, especially in postmenopausal women and older adults. The gut microbiota-immune-endocrine axis has recently emerged as an important regulator of bone homeostasis, but its mechanistic role in OP pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. This review synthesizes current evidence on how gut dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and endocrine changes interact to promote bone loss. Clinical and preclinical studies indicate that gut dysbiosis in OP is characterized by reduced microbial diversity and an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, leading to altered levels of key microbial metabolites-such as decreased short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that normally promote bone formation, and increased lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that drives inflammation. Immune changes include chronic low-grade inflammation with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines [e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)] and an imbalanced T-cell profile skewed toward osteoclastogenic T helper 17 (Th17) over anti-osteoclastogenic regulatory T (Treg) cells, which together favor bone resorption. Endocrine factors further modulate this gut-bone crosstalk: estrogen deficiency (in postmenopausal OP) promotes gut dysbiosis and Th17 expansion; excess glucocorticoids compromise the gut barrier and induce dysbiosis; gut-derived incretin hormones [e.g., glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY)] are influenced by microbial metabolites like butyrate; and parathyroid hormone (PTH) effects on bone are both regulated by and dependent on the gut microbiota. Overall, OP can be viewed as a multi-system disorder involving an interplay among the gut microbiome, the immune system, and the endocrine system. This integrated perspective on the "gut-bone axis" suggests that interventions targeting the gut microbiota (probiotics, prebiotics, etc.) could complement traditional therapies for OP. Enhancing skeletal health may require a multidisciplinary approach that considers gut microbial status, immune function, and hormonal milieu in tandem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.