ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia: a real-world data mining study of the FAERS and Vigibase database reveals potential safety signals and risk patterns.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is an uncommon, idiopathic interstitial lung disease distinguished by the atypical accumulation of eosinophils within the pulmonary parenchyma and airways. The condition often presents insidiously and is frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed; pharmacological agents are among the acknowledged precipitants of this disorder. Methods: This is a retrospective pharmacovigilance investigation. We utilized the FAERS and Vigibase databases to detect adverse reactions associated with drug-related EP. Results: We identified a total of 15,374 cases of drug-induced EP in FAERS. The incidence was highest, at 24.1%, among individuals aged 45 to 64 years, with 35.4% of the affected patients requiring hospitalization. In terms of the numerical composition of PTs, pneumonitis was the most predominant PT. Although the proportion of PTs varied for each drug and pneumonitis remained the most common, antibacterials exhibited a higher prevalence of "eosinophilic pneumonia" and "pulmonary eosinophilia." Notable observations include significant signal variations between the two databases for certain drugs, yet all positive signal drugs identified by FAERS can be confirmed by Vigibase. Initial screening identified 302 suspect drugs; following disproportionality filtering, univariate analysis, and lasso shrinkage, 56 agents were retained. Nivolumab was the most frequently reported drug (1,377 reports), followed by pembrolizumab (1,070 reports) and daptomycin (758 reports), with daptomycin exhibiting the most significant statistical signal in FAERS. Time-to-onset analysis indicated that EP typically manifested early. Multivariable modeling identified higher body weight, advancing age, and polypharmacy as associated factors. The drugs most strongly associated with EP were daptomycin (OR 12.50, 95% CI 9.40-16.75), durvalumab (OR 5.17, 95% CI 3.74-7.14), fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan (OR 4.86, 95% CI 3.32-7.04), idelalisib (OR 4.74, 95% CI 3.13-7.07), and osimertinib (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.11-4.79). Conclusion: The early discontinuation of the offending drug, timely initiation of corticosteroid therapy, and multidisciplinary collaboration are fundamental to achieving improved outcomes in cases of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia. This study offers substantial real-world evidence to facilitate the early identification and optimal management of eosinophilic pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.