Evidence mapPaperPMID 42100253Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Association between pulse pressure levels and mortality in patients with septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.

Yu Ji, Lisha Huang, Chang Cao, Wenyan Xiao, Tianfeng Hua, Min Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu Ji *Department of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Lisha Huang *Department of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Chang CaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Wenyan XiaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Tianfeng HuaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Min YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine The Second, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Research on the impact of Pulse Pressure (PP) levels on Septic Shock patient prognosis is relatively limited. This study aims to analyze data from septic shock patients to investigate the prognostic effects of maintaining different PP levels during the early resuscitation phase. Methods: Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV 3.1 database and septic shock patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected from the Second Department of Critical Care Medicine at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Patient information was gathered, and the average PP over the first 24 h in the ICU (PP Results: PP Conclusion: In our study, maintaining PP levels between 40 and 70 mmHg during early resuscitation was associated with significantly lower 28-day mortality in septic shock patients. Our exploratory findings suggest that hemodynamic management strategies might need to consider patient age. Future studies are needed to investigate whether targeting an upper PP limit in elderly patients or avoiding low PP in younger patients could improve outcomes.

Indexed as

28-day mortalityhemodynamic managementprognosispropensity score matchingpulse pressureseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID42100253
PMCPMC13143930

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.