SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma: a systematic review of prognostic biomarkers and minimal residual disease monitoring.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current multiple myeloma (MM) risk stratification, anchored on the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), provides a static snapshot of disease but fails to capture its dynamic biological evolution, functional tumor-microenvironment crosstalk, and real-time treatment response. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic and metabolomic profiling has emerged as a high-sensitivity tool for both novel biomarker discovery and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This systematic review evaluates the independent prognostic value and clinical utility of quantitative MS-based proteomics and metabolomics compared to standard-of-care risk models and traditional disease monitoring techniques. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion required quantitative MS-based proteomics or metabolomics in MM cohorts with outcomes compared to ISS/R-ISS or traditional MRD detection methods. Data analysis was performed with a focus on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratios (HR), and MRD sensitivity thresholds. Results: From 1,077 records, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven discovery-focused studies identified specific MS-derived signatures, such as microenvironmental proteins (e.g., MTA2, CD44) and dysregulated lipid metabolites (e.g., acylcarnitines, LysoPE) that were consistently associated with PFS and OS. Crucially, MS-based biomarkers retained independent prognostic significance in multivariate models adjusted for R-ISS. Furthermore, 8 studies tackling blood-based MS-MRD detection demonstrated up to 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than traditional immunofixation electrophoresis, identified biochemical relapse 2-11 months earlier, and achieved high concordance with bone marrow-based assays (NGS/NGF). Conclusion: In conclusion, quantitative MS profiling provides a high-resolution molecular lens that significantly refines MM risk stratification beyond static staging. By enabling non-invasive, longitudinal MRD monitoring with superior lead times, MS integration facilitates a shift from reactive to proactive intervention. Standardization of bioinformatics pipelines and MS methodologies is now the final barrier to implementing MS-guided treatment adjustments in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.