ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Critical considerations in the administration of antineoplastic therapy for patients with malignant solid tumors undergoing hemodialysis.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease exhibit a higher risk of developing malignancies, and among those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, approximately 7% are diagnosed with new-onset tumors within five years. Patients with ESRD who are receiving antineoplastic treatment exhibit a significantly higher incidence and greater severity of adverse effects associated with antineoplastic agents compared to individuals with normal renal function. This complexity involves multiple factors, including the therapy options and dose adjustment of antineoplastic agents, drug-related toxicities, management of fluid overload, and the maintenance of internal homeostasis in ESRD patients with malignancies. Patients undergoing hemodialysis are at heightened risk of drug toxicity if doses of renally cleared medications are not appropriately individualized; conversely, subtherapeutic drug exposure may occur due to premature and substantial removal of medications during the dialysis session. Unfortunately, there is little information on the appropriate dosing and pharmacokinetics of most chemotherapeutic agents in dialysis patients being treated for cancer. Therefore, ensuring the safety of antineoplastic therapy in ESRD patients has emerged as a significant clinical challenge for both nephrologists and oncologists. This article summarized the effects of uremia and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used antineoplastic agents, along with an overview of real-world evidence on the use of these agents in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. It aims to provide clinically valuable information to optimize antineoplastic therapy in this patient population, with the ultimate goal of prolonging survival periods and reducing the incidence of severe drug-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.