Evidence mapPaperPMID 42100425Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Relationship between myeloid skewing and colorectal cancer risk in the Framingham Heart Study.

Lisa Ek Orloff, Michael De Lisio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa Ek OrloffSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael De LisioSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Differential regulation of myelopoiesis may contribute to divergent colorectal cancer (CRC) risk profiles associated with obesity and physical activity; however, this relationship has not been examined in humans. This study explored the relationship between myeloid skewing (monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio), physical activity, obesity, and CRC risk in a retrospective cohort. Methods: From the Framingham study cohort, myeloid skewing was compared across BMI categories, waist circumference quartiles, and physical activity index (PAI) quintiles. Among participants who eventually received a CRC diagnosis, Cox proportional hazards models evaluated baseline circulating myeloid skewing as a predictor of incident CRC, adjusted for covariates. Results: Within the total study population (n = 5037), myeloid skewing increased across BMI categories, and waist circumference quartiles (P <.001), and decreased in the highest vs lowest PAI (P <.01). In the predictive cohort (non-CRC, n = 818; CRC, n = 16), continuous Cox models (per 1-SD increase in myeloid skewing) showed hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 1.08 to 1.37. Associations were statistically significant in BMI, waist circumference, BMI and waist circumference, PAI, diabetes, sex, and smoking adjusted models (HRs 1.30-1.37; P <.05), but were attenuated and not statistically significant in age, age and sex, and medication adjusted models (HRs 1.08-1.28; P >.05). Discussion: Obesity and lower physical activity were associated with higher myeloid skewing, and higher myeloid skewing was associated with increased incident CRC hazard across several adjusted Cox models. These findings highlight myeloid skewing as a candidate marker linking adiposity and physical inactivity to CRC risk and justify prospective validation in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerFramingham Heart Studymyeloid skewingobesityphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID42100425
PMCPMC13143660

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.