Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42100497›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience applied2026

Comparing personalized and population-based models for predicting momentary negative affect in internalizing disorders: A digital phenotyping study.

Leona Hammelrath, Roshan Prakash Rane, Sam Gijsen, Franziska Jüres, Annette Brose, Kerstin Ritter, Kevin Hilbert, Frank Jacobi, Babette Renneberg, Lydia Fehm and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leona HammelrathDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Roshan Prakash RaneCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sam GijsenCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska JüresDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Annette BroseDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin RitterCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kevin HilbertDepartment of Psychology, HMU Health and Medical University Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Frank JacobiPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Babette RennebergDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lydia FehmDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Norbert KathmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike LuekenDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative affect (NA), encompassing heightened states of sadness, anxiety, and guilt, is a key symptom across a spectrum of internalizing disorders. Recent advancements in digital phenotyping (DP) and machine learning (ML) may enable the automatic detection of short-term fluctuations in NA through digital phenotyping, a prerequisite for Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAI). Evidence on the prediction of momentary NA with DP is sparse, but it indicates that personalized ML models are required to account for individual heterogeneities. This preregistered study is the first to analyze data from the PREACT-digital project, encompassing 242 outpatient subjects diagnosed with internalizing disorders. We examined whether passive sensor data (heart rate, steps, mobility, physical activity) could predict momentary NA, as assessed via ecologically momentary assessments (EMA). Personalized and population-based ML approaches were trained on 19,792 pairs of DP data and NA ratings. We found that personalized ML approaches substantially outperformed population-based models. The best model, however, only marginally exceeded the benchmark, predicting per-person mean NA. Our findings emphasize the need for personalized ML in DP studies. Future efforts could incorporate richer or more raw data streams or test sequential modelling approaches to help clarify whether DP and personalized ML could reliably inform just-in-time, data-driven support for individuals affected by internalizing disorders.

Indexed as

Digital phenotypingInternalizing disordersJITAIMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42100497
PMCPMC13145394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.