ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Understanding and engaging with vocalisations during labour and birth: A qualitative interview study of midwives' experiences and approaches.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous vocalisations are a common reaction to pain. During childbirth, birthing women often produce vocalisations that shift in tone and intensity in response to the demands and dynamic process of childbirth. Research has shown that midwives can distinguish between different vocalisations; however, the embodied, experiential, and tacit knowledge underpinning this skill remains largely under-researched. Objective: To explore and analyse midwives' experiences and approaches with vocalisations during labour and birth. Methods: This study employed a constructionist approach within an explorative qualitative design to explore and analyse midwives' experiences and approaches to vocalisations during labour and birth. The study was conducted throughout Germany. Nineteen midwives with experience as the primary healthcare provider for birthing women in free-standing birth centres, hospital labour wards, or at home births participated in the study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2024 and February 2025. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke. Results: Four themes were generated through iterative engagement with the data. These are: (1) Developing and training auditory skills: learning to listen and attune to birth sounds; (2) Recognising nuances of childbirth sound patterns; (3) Combining childbirth vocalisations, sensory perceptions and embodied cues; and (4) The multi-faceted nature of working with sound. The data showed that midwives developed their auditory skills over time, either through deliberate engagement with vocalisations or with guidance from colleagues and mentors. Integrating birthing women's vocalisations added depth to midwives' assessments and provision of care. While several midwives described how they intentionally worked with vocalisations as a component to accompany and support labour, others noted that they rarely made use of vocalisations. When midwives reported that they worked with vocalisations, they described using them to support well-being and physiological processes during childbirth. Conclusion: Vocalisations are an integral part of labour and birth. The findings highlight that understanding and interpreting these sounds can serve as a meaningful component for supporting well-being, physiology as well as recognising physiological processes and deviations from these during childbirth. Incorporating training in auditory perception into midwifery education would prepare students in their practice-based skills and support non-technological approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.