ArticleiScience2026
Electronic medical record-based causal network modeling for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis in the emergency department.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis in the emergency department, the atypical manifestations and limited information lead to clinical challenge. Data-driven methods often fail in the generalizability against the atypical and limited information. In this work, the causality of AMI is studied based on electronic medical record (EMR), and a framework to construct causal network for AMI diagnosis is proposed. The EMRs with seven categories and 6,001 samples are included. Score-based algorithm, structural equation model, and network coarse-graining are adopted to build causal network with medical knowledge. A model validation procedure is proposed to test the model performance when only part of variable information is obtained. Compared with data-driven methods, causal network achieves best comprehensive performance. Further, the causal effects between variables and AMI can be quantified, which are verified by the sensitivity analysis on unobserved confounders. Such results can support the disease diagnosis, treatment, and healthcare in clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.