ArticleJBI evidence synthesis2026
Predictive models for patients treated with or evaluated for peritoneal dialysis: a scoping review protocol.
Article in JBI evidence synthesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis scoping review will map available research regarding predictive models for clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving or considered for peritoneal dialysis.
introductionChronic kidney disease affects over 840 million people worldwide, with peritoneal dialysis offering a home-based kidney replacement therapy. Although evidence demonstrates equivalent long-term survival between dialysis modalities, the individual patient prognosis may favor a particular modality, making personalized outcome prediction essential. Available research evidence is not reflected in guideline recommendations, with clinicians relying on clinical experience rather than evidence-based prediction models. An evaluation of prediction models is required to identify validated tools and guide their clinical implementation. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review will include patients receiving peritoneal dialysis or who are being considered for initiation, with no restrictions regarding age, modality, or chronicity of disease. The scope will encompass the development, validation, and evaluation of clinical models utilizing multiple predictors for peritoneal dialysis-relevant outcomes. Any health care setting will be included, with no geographic or language restrictions.
methodsMEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus will be searched, complemented by citation tracking and gray literature searches. Two independent reviewers will conduct title/abstract screening and full-text assessment using predefined criteria. Data extraction will be performed using standardized forms combining CHARMS, TRIPOD+AI, PROBAST, and PROGRESS-Plus. Data synthesis will follow a descriptive quantitative analysis and narrative synthesis, with outcomes categorized using the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis framework. The analysis will combine outcome mapping, predictor database development, model validation assessment, clinical accessibility evaluation, and population gap identification. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF https://osf.io/7dmaq/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.