ReviewJournal of global health2026
Folate and global health review series, part 3: syntheses on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and metabolic diseases.
Review in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases account for an increasing share of morbidity and mortality globally. Folic acid supplementation has been linked to a lowered risk of stroke and some metabolic indicators due to its involvement in homocysteine and one-carbon metabolism and its role in the production of nitric oxide; however, the evidence on these associations is inconclusive. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects from inception to February 2024 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the associations of folate (dietary intake, supplementation, or blood concentrations) with any cardiometabolic outcome. We performed screening, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment in duplicate, and assessed the credibility of the evidence using predefined criteria. Results: We identified 113 unique associations from 49 reviews. The included syntheses mostly had low risk of bias of and provided pooled risk estimates from intervention trials or prospective cohorts. A larger volume of evidence was available for composite cardiovascular outcomes, coronary heart disease, and stroke compared to other outcomes. No association reached a convincing or highly suggestive level of credibility. Six directional associations and five null associations met the criteria for a suggestive level of credibility. Three dose-response relationships, all at suggestive levels of credibility, supported an association between higher dietary folate intake and a reduced risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Conclusion: The available evidence on the association between folate status and cardiometabolic outcomes primarily focuses on secondary prevention of cardiometabolic diseases and substantially underrepresents low- and middle-income countries. More large-scale studies are warranted to validate a relationship between folate status and cardiometabolic events or indicators. Overall, the evidence landscape around folate and cardiometabolic diseases appears to be limited both in volume and scope. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021265041.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.