Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101494›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026

Dynamic functional connectivity in borderline personality disorder: associations with trauma, emotion regulation and symptom severity.

Arshia Rana, Marie-Luise Otte, Giovanni Fazio, Daniele Olivio, Yéléna Le Prieult, Mike M Schmitgen, Yunus Balcik, Mert Koc, Chantal Tech, Nadine D Wolf and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Arshia Rana *Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2611-2282
Marie-Luise Otte *Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Giovanni FazioDepartment of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Daniele OlivioDepartment of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Yéléna Le PrieultDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mike M SchmitgenDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yunus BalcikDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mert KocDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chantal TechDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nadine D WolfDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabio SambataroDepartment of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Robert Christian WolfDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. Christian.wolf@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAltered intrinsic functional connectivity is a well-established marker of borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, recent research suggests that investigating brain dynamics may offer a more detailed perspective on the neural signatures of BPD-related symptoms.

methodsResting-state fMRI data were analyzed in female patients with BPD (n = 47) and healthy controls (n = 28) to derive dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) indices using both meta-state and cluster-state approaches. Between-group comparisons assessed BPD-related dFNC alterations, while dimensional analyses explored associations between network dynamics and distinct symptom dimensions.

resultsBoth meta-state and cluster-state analyses revealed strong associations between symptom dimensions and dynamic range and fluidity. Meta-state analysis indicated that greater emotion regulation difficulties corresponded to an expanded state repertoire, reflecting increased variability in large-scale network configurations. Cluster-state analysis showed that fewer state transitions were associated with heightened borderline symptom severity, greater childhood trauma exposure, and increased dissociative symptoms. Furthermore, childhood trauma and emotion regulation difficulties moderated the relationship between time spent in specific cluster-states and borderline symptom severity.

conclusionThese findings suggest that reduced dynamic flexibility but increased dynamic range in large-scale brain networks may contribute to core BPD symptoms, particularly in early trauma, emotion dysregulation as well as borderline symptom severity. The results highlight the association between aberrant dFNC and BPD and contribute to a more detailed characterization of neural dynamics relevant to the disorder.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesBorderline Personality DisorderEmotional RegulationMagnetic Resonance ImagingSymptom BurdenAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNerve NetRestYoung AdultBorderline personality disorderChronnectomeCluster-statesMagnetic resonance imagingMeta-statesResting stateTime-varying connectivity

Identifiers

PMID42101494
PMCPMC13481553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.