ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Redox-modulation of regulated cell death: implications for synergistic anticancer therapies.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) constitute a unifying molecular axis across various cancer therapy modalities and are primary regulators of regulated cell death (RCD). Generally, cancer cells function under high oxidative stress to maintain proliferation, making them vulnerable to therapeutic approaches that push RONS levels above their survival threshold. The purpose of this review is to consolidate mechanistic evidence linking redox modulation to therapeutic efficacy. We analyzed current literature regarding standard and emerging anticancer modalities, including radiotherapy, proton therapy, FLASH therapy, chemotherapy, cold atmospheric plasma, photodynamic therapy, and engineered nanoplatforms. We specifically examined the molecular mechanisms by which these therapies induce mitochondrial ROS accumulation and trigger distinct cell death pathways. Our literature review indicates that these diverse modalities achieve tumor selectivity by increasing mitochondrial ROS beyond cytotoxic limits. When combined strategically, they further promote tumor-specific oxidative stress, maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. We also highlight the critical biosafety considerations and regulatory frameworks necessary for the safe clinical translation of these RONS-based treatments. Redox-modulating strategies can address critical challenges, including chemoradiation resistance, metabolic rewiring, and the persistence of cancer stem cells. We propose that RONS-centered therapeutic design represents a viable strategy to improve the efficacy of contemporary cancer treatments by combining redox biology with cutting-edge therapeutic engineering. This graphical abstract depicts how various cancer treatment modalities cause RONS-mediated oxidative stress, hence activating different cell death pathways in cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42101631What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.