Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101666›Full record

ReviewBioscience reports2026

Using iPSC models to examine neuron-glia interactions in neurodegenerative diseases.

Dianne M Lopez, Lois K Keavey, Kathryn R Bowles

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dianne M Lopez *UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, Scotland, U.K.
Lois K Keavey *UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, Scotland, U.K.
Kathryn R BowlesUK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, Scotland, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3311-5245

Funding

Medical Research Scotland (MRS) PHD-50673-2023Parkinson's UK (Parkinson's Disease Society) G-2304UK Dementia Research Institute (UK DRI) UK DRI-4211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases remain without effective or accessible treatments and interventions, despite their increasing global burden. Clinically, these disorders are characterised by progressive cognitive decline, behavioural changes, and loss of motor function, all of which are associated with neuronal and synaptic loss or dysfunction. Although traditionally viewed as neuron-centric, it is becoming increasingly clear that glial cells play critical roles in maintaining and regulating neuronal and synaptic health. Mounting evidence implicates glial dysregulation in both the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases through mechanisms such as aberrant synaptic engulfment and protein clearance, impaired homeostatic support, metabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation, transmission of pathogenic proteins, and cellular senescence. Elucidating how disruptions in neuron-glia interactions contribute to neuronal dysfunction is therefore essential for developing effective therapies. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based models provide a powerful platform to investigate these interactions in human-relevant systems. Here, we will discuss recent insights into the mechanisms contributing to neurodegenerative disease that have been gained specifically from modelling neuron-glia interactions in human iPSCs.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurogliaNeuronsAnimalsHumansastrocytesinduced pluripotent stem cellsmicroglianeurodegenerationneurons

Identifiers

PMID42101666
PMCPMC13161353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.