Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101974›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Loneliness and cognitive decline among U.S. adults: A stratified analysis of the BRFSS.

Mojisola Fasokun, Temitope Ogundare, Fadeke Ogunyankin, Kaelyn Gordon, Seun Ikugbayigbe, Miriam Michael, Kakra Hughes, Oluwasegun Akinyemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mojisola FasokunDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5939-3449
Temitope OgundareDepartment of Psychiatry, New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-0013
Fadeke OgunyankinDepartment of Research Data Science and Analytics, Cook Children's Health Care System: Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Kaelyn GordonThe Clive O Callender Outcomes Research Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5627-9655
Seun IkugbayigbeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, United States of America.
Miriam MichaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, United States of America.
Kakra HughesDepartment of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, United States of America.
Oluwasegun AkinyemiThe Clive O Callender Outcomes Research Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is an emerging public health concern linked to adverse mental and physical outcomes. It may play a key role in cognitive aging, yet its population-level association with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) across demographic groups is not well characterized. We evaluated how the frequency of loneliness relates to SCD in U.S. adults and whether associations differ by sex, age and race/ethnicity.

methodsWe performed a cross‑sectional analysis of adults aged ≥18 years using nationally representative 2016-2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data (BFRSS). Loneliness was categorized as never, rarely, sometimes, usually or always. The primary outcome was self‑reported SCD in the past year. Survey‑weighted logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors, health insurance, metropolitan status and survey year were used to estimate adjusted marginal probabilities of SCD across loneliness categories. Interaction terms and stratified margins evaluated effect modification by sex, age group (18-44, 45-64 and ≥65 years) and race/ethnicity (non‑Hispanic White, non‑Hispanic Black and Hispanic).

resultsAmong 85,969 adults who reported loneliness, 13,879 (16.2%) experienced subjective cognitive decline (SCD), with a mean age of 65.7 ± 10.6 years. Loneliness showed a strong dose-response relationship with SCD. Predicted probabilities of SCD increased from 9.9% (95% CI, 9.3-10.5%) among respondents who never felt lonely to 15.0% (14.1-15.9%) for rarely, 24.9% (23.6-26.1%) for sometimes, 38.4% (34.4-42.5%) for usually and 45.7% (41.0-50.4%) for always lonely adults (p < 0.001). Women who were always lonely had an adjusted probability of SCD that was 10.7 percentage points higher than men; sex differences were negligible at lower loneliness levels. Age differences were minimal across most loneliness categories; however, among adults who were always lonely, those aged >64 years had significantly lower predicted cognitive function compared with adults aged 18-64 years (p < 0.001). Racial and ethnic differences were modest; the only significant contrast was a 1.7 percentage‑point lower probability of SCD for non‑Hispanic Black adults compared with Whites among those who never felt lonely. Other subgroup differences were not statistically significant.

conclusionsLoneliness is independently and strongly associated with higher likelihood of subjective cognitive decline among U.S. adults, and this relationship is most pronounced for chronic loneliness. While sex and age modified the effect of loneliness, racial/ethnic disparities were minimal. These findings identify loneliness as a modifiable social determinant of cognitive health, supporting the need for broad social connection initiatives and targeted efforts for women and mid-life adults with chronic loneliness.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLonelinessAdolescentAdultAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42101974
PMCPMC13155599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.