ArticlePloS one2026
Socioeconomic inequalities and the COVID-19 pandemic in France: Territorial analyzes based on epidemic wave and metropolitan area.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have highlighted the relationship between socioeconomic inequalities and the general population's risk of contracting or dying from COVID-19 during the 2020-2023 pandemic. In France, socioeconomic inequalities vary across metropolitan areas; few studies have investigated whether this variation explains the spatial disparities observed in COVID-19 incidence and testing rates during the pandemic. We examined the relationship between socioeconomic profiles and these two rates across all 22 metropolitan areas in France for eight of the country's nine epidemic waves.
methodsFor each metropolitan area, we used socioeconomic variables from census data to define socioeconomic profiles through principal component clustering. We then used spatialized generalised additive mixed models to analyze associations between these profiles and both testing and incidence rates, for each epidemic wave from July 2020 to March 2023. Finally, we performed meta-regressions to study the distribution of testing and incidence rate ratios among the various socioeconomically deprived and privileged profiles within each of the 22 metropolitan areas, according to COVID-19 vaccination rate.
resultsTesting rates were lower in socioeconomically deprived metropolitan areas than in privileged ones, except during wave 4 (July-October-2021), when testing rates were more similar. Incidence rates were higher in deprived areas (waves 2-4, July-2020 to October-2021), but this pattern reversed between waves 6-9 (March-2022 to March-2023). Meta-regressions indicated that high vaccination coverage was associated with a narrower gap in testing between deprived and privileged areas. Moreover, for each metropolitan area, the higher the level of deprivation in a zone within the deprived profile, the greater the deprived-privileged gap in under-testing.
conclusionsThe impact of socioeconomic inequalities on testing and incidence patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in each metropolitan area in France was driven by the most deprived zones; this impact varied across epidemic waves. Higher vaccination rates and government health measures (lockdowns, mandatory health pass) may have reduced this variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.