ArticleScientific data2026
An Annotated Corneal Confocal Microscopy Dataset for Nerve Segmentation and Clinical Characterization.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Annotated Corneal Confocal Microscopy Dataset for Nerve Segmentation and Clinical Characterization.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal confocal microscopy enables in vivo visualisation of the sub-basal nerve plexus; however, most available datasets provide only centreline annotations, and open pixel-level annotations are comparatively scarce, limiting broader pixel-level segmentation research. Existing resources vary in quality, annotation strategy, and clinical coverage, complicating objective algorithm comparisons and reducing their utility in developing robust models. To address these gaps, we introduce a new dataset of 410 high-quality images from 88 participants, each paired with an expert-reviewed pixel-level nerve mask. These images span two independently collected subsets with distinct acquisition conditions and participant groups. Demographic information is available for each participant, and one subset contained detailed clinical and laboratory data. The dataset offers detailed, manually curated delineations of nerve fibres, consistent formatting, and clear provenance. It is intended to support the training and validation of segmentation models, assess generalisability across imaging conditions, and explore the associations between image-derived metrics and clinical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.