Evidence mapPaperPMID 42103758Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

An Annotated Corneal Confocal Microscopy Dataset for Nerve Segmentation and Clinical Characterization.

Qincheng Qiao, Juan Cao, Xinguo Hou

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qincheng QiaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.
Juan CaoDepartment of Health Management Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.
Xinguo HouDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China. houxinguo@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2045-1290

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFA1801100Project of Chronic Disease Management with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine CXZH2024066Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province tstp20231250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal confocal microscopy enables in vivo visualisation of the sub-basal nerve plexus; however, most available datasets provide only centreline annotations, and open pixel-level annotations are comparatively scarce, limiting broader pixel-level segmentation research. Existing resources vary in quality, annotation strategy, and clinical coverage, complicating objective algorithm comparisons and reducing their utility in developing robust models. To address these gaps, we introduce a new dataset of 410 high-quality images from 88 participants, each paired with an expert-reviewed pixel-level nerve mask. These images span two independently collected subsets with distinct acquisition conditions and participant groups. Demographic information is available for each participant, and one subset contained detailed clinical and laboratory data. The dataset offers detailed, manually curated delineations of nerve fibres, consistent formatting, and clear provenance. It is intended to support the training and validation of segmentation models, assess generalisability across imaging conditions, and explore the associations between image-derived metrics and clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

CorneaNerve FibersAlgorithmsHumansMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID42103758
PMCPMC13369341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.