Evidence mapPaperPMID 42105007Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2026

Development of a machine learning-based prognostic prediction model and a web-based tool for pediatric hepatoblastoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database study.

Zhen Chen, Yandong Wei, Shuli Liu, Jun Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhen ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yandong WeiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuli LiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, 100021, China. jun_zhang0321@126.com.

Funding

Shandong Natural Science Foundation ZR2022MH315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic evaluation of pediatric hepatoblastoma (HB) remains challenging due to the low accuracy of traditional risk stratification models. This study aims to leverage the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to develop and compare several machine learning-based survival models and create an online prediction tool for individualized survival probability estimation in children with HB.

methodsA total of 614 pediatric HB patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2021 in the SEER database were identified and randomly split (7:3 ratio) into a training set (n = 429) and an internal hold-out validation cohort (n = 185). This split was selected to retain sufficient data for model development while preserving an adequate validation cohort for performance assessment. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used for feature selection, and three prognostic prediction models (Cox regression, random survival forest (RSF), and a deep learning-based survival (DeepSurv) neural network) were developed using the training data. Model performance was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) at 1, 3, and 5 years, and decision curve analysis (DCA). We also used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to interpret the RSF model. Based on RSF-derived risk scores, patients were classified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups for survival analysis. Ultimately, a web-based tool was developed to enable real-time prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities using individual patient characteristics.

resultsIn the validation cohort, the RSF model achieved the highest C-index (0.745), outperforming the DeepSurv (0.720) and Cox regression models (0.709). The RSF also yielded favorable 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year AUC values, and DCA indicated a greater net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis highlighted distant-stage disease, surgical treatment status, and tumor extent as key factors influencing survival predictions. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by the RSF risk groups showed significantly different survival outcomes among high-, intermediate-, and low-risk patients (log-rank P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The finalized online tool allows users to input patient characteristics and obtain estimated 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival probabilities, which may assist individualized prognostic assessment as an adjunctive reference.

conclusionThe RSF-based prognostic model showed favorable predictive performance compared with the Cox and DeepSurv models in this retrospective SEER-based cohort of pediatric HB. With interpretable model outputs and an accessible web-based interface, the model may serve as an adjunctive tool for individualized risk assessment. However, external validation and prospective evaluation are required before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

HepatoblastomaLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInternetMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRisk AssessmentSEER ProgramDeepSurvMachine learning prognostic modelPediatric hepatoblastomaRandom survival forestSEER database

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.