SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2026
Physicians' Knowledge and Experiences of Counseling on Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine in Cancer Care: a Qualitative Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe increasing use of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM) among patients with cancer raises questions about physicians' knowledge and counseling practices in this area. This qualitative systematic review used a narrative synthesis approach to explore physicians' understanding and experiences with CAIM counseling in cancer care. RECENT
findingsA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and AMED, supplemented by hand-searching reference lists, identified 35 eligible studies. Analysis revealed four key themes: limited knowledge and training on CAIM; concerns about CAIM safety and efficacy; recognition of CAIM's role in holistic cancer care; and challenges in patient-physician communication regarding CAIM. Physicians acknowledge the importance of CAIM in person-centered cancer care but express concerns about its safety and effectiveness, underscoring the need for improved CAIM education and training. Future research should include perspectives from medical trainees and other healthcare providers to enhance counseling practices and support integrative cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.