Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42106496›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Multi-dimensional MRI representation and privileged learning approaches to functional outcome prediction for ischemic stroke patients.

Emily Wittrup, John Reavey-Cantwell, Aditya S Pandey, Dennis J Rivet Ii, Badih J Daou, Kayvan Najarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily WittrupGilbert S. Omenn Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of MIchigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ewittrup@umich.edu.
John Reavey-CantwellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Aditya S PandeyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, MIchigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dennis J Rivet IiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Badih J DaouDepartment of Neurological Surgery, MIchigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kayvan NajarianGilbert S. Omenn Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of MIchigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of long-term functional outcomes for stroke patients remains a clinical challenge, despite advances in diagnostics and treatments. Most machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) outcome prediction models lack robust strategies to incorporate high-dimensional clinical imaging data or to account for data availability at the point of care. In this study, we present an enhanced representation learning pipeline that fuses 2.5D magnetic resonance images (MRI), clinical data, and imaging biomarkers to predict 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for ischemic stroke patients. Using autoencoder-generated MRI embeddings, we systematically evaluate multiple ML/AI methods for both classification (90-day mRS > 2) and ordinal regression. Critically, we incorporate a privileged information paradigm, leveraging features available during training to enhance model generalizability without requiring them during inference. We developed and validated our models on a large public dataset (N = 974) and an external validation dataset (N = 738), demonstrating performance comparable to state-of-the-art convolutional neural network-based approaches with the added benefit of modularity (Test AUC 0.801; F1 0.699; MAE 1.179). Our results highlight the promise of representation learning and privileged information paradigms for bridging the gap between research and bedside prognosis in computational neurology.

Identifiers

PMID42106496
PMCPMC13381960

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.