ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Multi-dimensional MRI representation and privileged learning approaches to functional outcome prediction for ischemic stroke patients.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of long-term functional outcomes for stroke patients remains a clinical challenge, despite advances in diagnostics and treatments. Most machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) outcome prediction models lack robust strategies to incorporate high-dimensional clinical imaging data or to account for data availability at the point of care. In this study, we present an enhanced representation learning pipeline that fuses 2.5D magnetic resonance images (MRI), clinical data, and imaging biomarkers to predict 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for ischemic stroke patients. Using autoencoder-generated MRI embeddings, we systematically evaluate multiple ML/AI methods for both classification (90-day mRS > 2) and ordinal regression. Critically, we incorporate a privileged information paradigm, leveraging features available during training to enhance model generalizability without requiring them during inference. We developed and validated our models on a large public dataset (N = 974) and an external validation dataset (N = 738), demonstrating performance comparable to state-of-the-art convolutional neural network-based approaches with the added benefit of modularity (Test AUC 0.801; F1 0.699; MAE 1.179). Our results highlight the promise of representation learning and privileged information paradigms for bridging the gap between research and bedside prognosis in computational neurology.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.