ArticleScientific reports2026
From medical necessity to private-sector dominance: a two-decade evolution of caesarean section determinants in Bangladesh (2004-2022).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caesarean section (CS) is a critical life-saving intervention when medically directed, yet its prevalence in Bangladesh has surged impulsively from approximately 4% in 2004 to nearly 45% in 2022, highlighting a distinctive South Asian pattern of widespread surgical overuse. This study examines the shifting socioeconomic and geographic determinants of CS, specifically investigating the private sector's role in widening inequalities and the transition of surgical birth from a targeted medical necessity to a routine practice dominated by private-sector utilization. We analyzed Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data of 26,845 ever-married women, covering the periods 2004-2007, 2011-2014, and 2018-2022. Variables were harmonized and administrative divisions grouped into broader regions to ensure comparability. Using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of caesarean section, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and geographic factors while accounting for complex survey design. Weighted CS prevalence increased sharply, rising from 6.8% in 2004-2007 to 39% in 2018-2022. This surge was largely driven by the private sector, where CS rates expanded from roughly 55% in the earliest period to 84% in the most recent. Longitudinal analyses also revealed a notable shift in key determinants: medical indications, initially strong predictors in 2004-2007 (e.g., Multiple Births AOR 9.55), had substantially weaker effects by 2018-2022 (AOR 2.93), indicating growing widespread saturation of CS beyond clinical necessity. The influence of frequent antenatal care similarly declined over time (AOR 9.62 to 4.62), though it remained a significant predictor. Socioeconomic patterns shifted as well; women in the "poorer" wealth quintile moved from having lower odds of CS in 2004-2007 (AOR 0.53) to higher odds in 2018-2022 (AOR 1.45), suggesting increased penetration of surgical delivery into lower-income groups. Geographically, residence in Coastal areas consistently remained protective relative to the Central region. Caesarean delivery in Bangladesh has shifted from a life-saving procedure to a highly prevalent practice, driven predominantly by the expansion of private-sector facilities. An unregulated private sector, rising healthcare contact, and socioeconomic disparities now fuel overuse, demanding stronger regulation, clinical audits, and expanded midwifery‑led care to ensure appropriate use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.