ArticleHuman genomics2026
Exploring the prognostic role of senescence-related genes in gastric cancer through multi-omics integration and machine learning.
Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular senescence plays a context-dependent role in gastric cancer (GC), functioning both through tumor-suppressive arrest and the tumor-promoting senescence-associated secretory phenotype. However, its systematic integration into prognostic models remains limited. Here, we develop a novel interpretable framework to identify and validate a robust senescence-related gene signature for GC prognosis. We first introduce a dual-model interpretable feature selection strategy that integrates a biologically informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Network with a tabular foundation model to identify cancer-associated senescence genes. From the initial candidates, an ensemble of ten machine learning algorithms distills a core 4-gene signature to construct a Senescence Risk Score (SRS). The SRS proves to be a powerful and independent prognostic indicator, effectively stratifies patients into high- and low-risk groups with distinct overall survival across multiple cohorts. High-risk patients exhibit an "immune-hot" but potentially dysfunctional tumor microenvironment, characterized by enriched immune cell infiltration, elevated checkpoint expression, and distinct metabolic reprogramming favoring pathways such as angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Furthermore, the SRS correlates with differential somatic mutation profiles and suggests potential sensitivity to specific chemotherapeutic agents. In vitro functional assays confirmed the oncogenic role of SERPINE1, a top-ranked core gene, in promoting GC cell proliferation. Regulatory network analysis revealed potential upstream transcription factors and miRNAs governing the signature. Collectively, we present a validated senescence-related prognostic signature that enables effective risk stratification of patients with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.