ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Positron-emission tomography as a predictor of response to first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are the standard first-line treatment for metastatic estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, yet acquired resistance remains a major challenge. Reliable biomarkers for prognostic stratification are therefore needed. We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients treated with first-line CDK4/6i between 2018 and 2023 who underwent baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Associations between baseline SUVmax and clinical outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox proportional hazards models, logistic regression for early progression, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for cut-off determination. Higher SUVmax was significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS; HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18, p = 0.016). Patients with SUVmax <8.0 experienced markedly longer PFS and improved 2-year PFS compared with those with SUVmax ≥8.0. Similarly, 2-year OS was substantially higher among patients with lower SUVmax values. In multivariable analysis, SUVmax remained an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Higher SUVmax was also associated with early progression, with an 18% increase in odds per unit (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33). These findings demonstrate that baseline SUVmax is a strong and readily accessible prognostic biomarker in patients receiving CDK4/6i, helping to identify individuals at elevated risk of early disease progression. Prospective validation is warranted.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.