ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026
Unveiling Marine Vesicle Uptake in Vibrio spp: Taxonomic and Environmental Insights.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling Marine Vesicle Uptake in Vibrio spp: Taxonomic and Environmental Insights.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are involved in diverse functions in nature, from biogeochemical cycles to pathogenesis. Here, we investigate whether taxonomy represents a boundary that constrains the uptake of vesicles between different marine species. We focus on Vibrio spp. since they are ubiquitous and play different roles, including in diseases affecting humans and marine organisms, such as corals. Spectral flow cytometry data showed intra- and inter-species uptake of EVs from the pathogenic Vibrio kanaloae and Vibrio coralliilyticus by different Vibrio strains and species, including other marine and non-marine Gram-negative and Gram-positive recipient bacteria. EV fusion efficiencies with recipient cells ranged from 53% to 99%, although these values may vary depending on the nutrient status of the cells. Data suggest that EV fusion between cells from different taxa can occur regardless the phylogenetic distance between the EV donor and recipient cell and the quantity of EVs added. Data revealed that nutrient conditions did not play a significant role in the number of EVs released by the analyzed Vibrio spp., although differences were observed in the amount of DNA exported in EVs (p-value = 0.02), with more bulk vesicular DNA cargo in diluted nutrient conditions. Nearly the entire genome of the targeted Vibrio spp. was detected in the EV fraction. Our data suggest that taxonomic distance between the EV donor and recipient cell is not a major boundary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.