ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Public health risk stratification using hybrid machine learning: a reproducible analysis of performance, stability, and risk attribution.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk stratification in public health involves organizing heterogeneous health-related signals into consistent representations that support population-level analysis. In large-scale datasets, such as National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), the integration of clinical, biometric, behavioral, and self-reported variables introduces structural variability that challenges conventional modeling approaches. This study proposes a hybrid learning framework that combines linear and nonlinear components to analyze induced risk representations derived from multidimensional health data. The model is evaluated using NHANES 2017-2018, BRFSS 2019, and an Integrated Public Health Dataset constructed through semantic harmonization of both sources. The experimental design is based on a controlled formulation in which a continuous risk index is constructed from the available variables and discretized into ordinal classes using quantiles, enabling systematic analysis of how models approximate structured partitions of the input space rather than predicting independent clinical outcomes. The results show that the hybrid scheme maintains consistent macro F1 and macro-ROC-AUC values across all scenarios with low fold-to-fold variability, reflecting the regularity of the induced class structure rather than predictive generalization. Attribution analysis reveals that the organization of the risk representation varies according to the nature of the data, with concentrated patterns in clinical signals, distributed contributions in behavioral variables, and intermediate structures in the integrated dataset. These findings demonstrate that hybrid schemes provide a stable and interpretable framework for analyzing the structural organization of risk in heterogeneous public health data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.