ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Explainable deep learning approaches and clinical insights for cancer biomarker identification.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers play a pivotal role in contemporary cancer immunotherapy by guiding diagnosis, patient stratification, therapeutic decision-making, and longitudinal assessment of treatment responses. Despite the transformative impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, and neoantigen-based vaccines, durable clinical benefit is achieved in only a subset of patients, highlighting the critical need for accurate predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Technological advances are rapidly expanding the biomarker repertoire through high-resolution approaches such as single-cell and spatial omics, circulating tumor DNA analysis, immune-related gene expression signatures, and microbiome profiling. These platforms enable deeper characterization of immune dynamics, resistance mechanisms, and therapeutic responsiveness. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning have fundamentally reshaped immunotherapy biomarker discovery by enabling the integration of complex, high-dimensional multiomics, radiomic, and clinical datasets into unified predictive frameworks. Deep learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor responses, immune-related adverse events, and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance across multiple cancer types. The incorporation of explainable AI approaches further enhances clinical interpretability by linking algorithmic predictions to biologically validated immune processes. Future progress will depend on multimodal biomarker integration, analytical standardization, and rigorous prospective validation, alongside addressing regulatory, economic, and implementation challenges to advance precision cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.