ArticleCureus2026
Severe Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG) During Efgartigimod Therapy in Neurological Practice: A Real-World Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Efgartigimod is a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) antagonist approved for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) who are anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, and for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). By blocking FcRn-mediated IgG recycling, efgartigimod lowers circulating IgG and reduces pathogenic autoantibodies. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy and an overall acceptable safety profile, but patients with low baseline IgG were generally not well represented. Objective The main objective of this study is to describe severe reductions in serum IgG observed in routine neurologic practice during efgartigimod therapy, and to explore their potential clinical implications, including infection risk and management considerations. Methods We performed a retrospective case series of 10 patients treated with efgartigimod in our practice between 2025 and 2026 for CIDP and MG. Available clinical data were reviewed, including diagnosis, prior immunotherapy exposure, baseline IgG (when available), serial IgG measurements, nadir IgG, and any documented infectious complications. Results Several patients developed marked hypogammaglobulinemia during treatment, including profound reductions to levels below 100 mg/dL in selected cases. Several patients reached IgG levels within ranges associated with increased susceptibility to infection (<500 mg/dL, particularly <400 mg/dL), although no severe infections were observed. One patient with CIDP and prior rituximab exposure had a baseline IgG of approximately 800 mg/dL, and later developed an IgG level of 66 mg/dL. Another patient without prior B-cell-depleting therapy also developed an IgG level below 100 mg/dL. No major infectious complication was documented during the observation period, but the degree of IgG suppression raised concern for clinically meaningful vulnerability to severe infection. Conclusions Efgartigimod therapy was associated with significant reductions in IgG in this real-world cohort. Because trial populations excluded or underrepresented patients with low baseline IgG, and did not meaningfully study extreme hypogammaglobulinemia, baseline and serial IgG monitoring should be strongly considered in all patients starting therapy, especially during the first six months. These findings highlight the potential for clinically meaningful IgG decline in certain patients, and support consideration of individualized monitoring strategies. These observations are hypothesis-generating and warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.