Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110262›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Beyond willingness: unpacking pharmacists' adoption of AI-driven clinical decision support systems through an extended UTAUT framework.

Yue Xie, Zhihui Song, Ente Wang, Ping Li, Jiawei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhihui SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ente WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiawei WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Against the backdrop of the rapid integration of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSSs) into pharmacy practice, the actual acceptance of these systems by pharmacists and the underlying psychological and organizational mechanisms remain inadequately understood. Grounded in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), this study examines the factors influencing hospital pharmacists' intention to use AI-CDSS and their subsequent usage behavior in China. Methods: The UTAUT framework was augmented by incorporating two additional constructs: technology trust and perceived risk. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the hypothesized relationships among variables. Results: The results indicated that performance expectancy ( Conclusion: The acceptance of AI-CDSS among hospital pharmacists is primarily driven by perceptions of performance benefits, ease of use, and trust in the technology. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing the clinical value, algorithm transparency, and organizational support for AI-CDSS implementation. This study extends the theoretical applicability of UTAUT in high-stakes AI-mediated clinical environments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision Support Systems, ClinicalPharmacistsAdultAttitude to ComputersChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacy Service, HospitalSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustartificial intelligence–based clinical decision support systempharmaciststructural equation modelingtechnology acceptanceUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID42110262
PMCPMC13152858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.