ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Experiences of service users receiving peer support in mental health services: Qualitative findings from the international UPSIDES trial.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although peer support is increasingly used in mental health services worldwide, service users' experiences have been studied mostly in high-income countries. The current study examined service users' experiences of peer support in the UPSIDES Trial, delivered across diverse cultural and resource contexts, including high, middle and low-income countries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 service users across six study sites (Germany [two sites], Uganda, Tanzania, Israel, and India) and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns in participants' experiences. To capture diverse perspectives, service users were purposively sampled based on pre-post changes in social inclusion and personal recovery, with participants randomly selected from the top and bottom 20% ('high' and 'low' responders). Four themes emerged: (1) adaptable settings and intervention flexibility; (2) 'active ingredients' such as mutuality, reciprocity, and role-modeling; (3) positive intra-personal, inter-personal, and behavioral outcomes; and (4) barriers, including mismatches, unmet expectations, unclear boundaries and challenges to continuity. The study highlights shared relational elements of peer support alongside context-specific adaptations. Findings reinforce its value as a complementary, person-centred service with global relevance, while pointing to challenges including improving matching, reducing dropout, and clarifying expectations. Site-specific aspects are discussed, offering insights for global implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.