Evidence mapPaperPMID 42110399Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026

Experiences of service users receiving peer support in mental health services: Qualitative findings from the international UPSIDES trial.

Yael Goldfarb, Alina Grayzman, Sarah Barber, Cerdic Hall, Maria Haun, Jasmine Kalha, Silvia Krumm, Rachel Mtei, Rebecca Nixdorf, Bernd Puschner and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yael GoldfarbSocial Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9895-6195
Alina GrayzmanSocial Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
Sarah BarberButabika National Referral Mental Hospital, Uganda.
Cerdic HallEast London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Maria HaunUlm University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Germany.
Jasmine KalhaCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, India.
Silvia KrummUlm University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Germany.
Rachel MteiIfakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania.
Rebecca NixdorfUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Bernd PuschnerUlm University Medical Center Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-4271
Mike SladeUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Galia S MoranSocial Work, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peer support is increasingly used in mental health services worldwide, service users' experiences have been studied mostly in high-income countries. The current study examined service users' experiences of peer support in the UPSIDES Trial, delivered across diverse cultural and resource contexts, including high, middle and low-income countries. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 service users across six study sites (Germany [two sites], Uganda, Tanzania, Israel, and India) and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns in participants' experiences. To capture diverse perspectives, service users were purposively sampled based on pre-post changes in social inclusion and personal recovery, with participants randomly selected from the top and bottom 20% ('high' and 'low' responders). Four themes emerged: (1) adaptable settings and intervention flexibility; (2) 'active ingredients' such as mutuality, reciprocity, and role-modeling; (3) positive intra-personal, inter-personal, and behavioral outcomes; and (4) barriers, including mismatches, unmet expectations, unclear boundaries and challenges to continuity. The study highlights shared relational elements of peer support alongside context-specific adaptations. Findings reinforce its value as a complementary, person-centred service with global relevance, while pointing to challenges including improving matching, reducing dropout, and clarifying expectations. Site-specific aspects are discussed, offering insights for global implementation.

Indexed as

global mental healthlow- and middle-income countriespeer supportqualitative researchrecoveryUPSIDES

Identifiers

PMID42110399
PMCPMC13150774

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.