ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
To evaluate the value of L1 cortical bone quantitative CT parameters in predicting osteoporosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the changing trends of cortical bone of the first lumbarvertebral body (L1 Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 169 participants who underwent simultaneous chest-abdominal or lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans. All participants were stratified by sex (male and female) and further divided into three age groups: 50-59 years, 60-69 years, and ≥ 70 years. Based on QCT results, participants were categorized into two groups: non-osteoporosis (including normal bone mass and osteopenia) and osteoporosis. The average density, average thickness, average area and the total volume of L1 Results: For all participants and the female subgroup, there were statistically significant differences in the average thickness, average area, and total volume of L1 Conclusion: The quantitative parameters including the average thickness, average area, and total volume of L1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.