ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Short-term changes in bodily pain and associated baseline factors in patients with fibromyalgia receiving paraprobiotic supplementation: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia is characterized by heterogeneous pain trajectories, and short-term clinical improvement may vary across patients. We explored whether routinely collected baseline clinical variables were associated with short-term bodily pain improvement in a real-world cohort of patients with fibromyalgia receiving paraprobiotic supplementation. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 86 women with fibromyalgia receiving paraprobiotic supplementation were followed for 2 months. Bodily Pain (BP) was assessed using the SF-36 at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months. The primary analysis used generalized estimating equations (GEE) with Gaussian family, identity link, and exchangeable working correlation structure, adjusted for age, years since diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Sensitivity analyses included alternative GEE working correlation structures, a linear mixed-effects model with patient-specific random intercept, and an ANCOVA model for BP at T2 adjusted for baseline BP. Results: In the primary analysis, time was significantly associated with SF-36 bodily pain (global Wald Conclusion: In this exploratory real-world cohort, SF-36 bodily pain scores improved over a two-month follow-up, with the clearest change observed at two months. Dyslipidemia was the factor most consistently associated with lower bodily pain scores across analytic approaches. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the observational design and absence of a control group, but they support further prospective controlled studies to clarify symptom trajectories and the role of metabolic factors in fibromyalgia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.