ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Comparative efficacy and post-discharge adverse events of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with different oral medications for procedural sedation in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combination sedation regimens are widely used in pediatric procedural sedation. However, the efficacy and incidence of post-discharge adverse events between intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral chloral hydrate and intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam remain unclear. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. A total of 180 children aged 1-6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for outpatient procedural sedation between December 2022 and October 2023 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral chloral hydrate (D+C group, n = 90) or intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam (D+M group, n = 90). The primary outcome was first-attempt sedation success. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of caregiver-reported post-discharge adverse events within 48 h, the incidence of peri-sedation adverse events, sedation onset time, procedure duration, recovery time, children's medication acceptance, and parental satisfaction. Results: The first-attempt sedation success rate was significantly higher in the D+M group than in the D+C group (95.56% vs. 86.67%, P = 0.036). Sedation onset time was shorter in the D+C group (P < 0.001), whereas recovery time and peri-sedation adverse events were comparable between the two groups. Children's medication acceptance and parental satisfaction were lower in the D+C group (P < 0.001). During the 0-48 h period after discharge, the D+C group had higher incidences of somnolence, ataxia, and any adverse event (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed that the D+M regimen was independently associated with lower risks of several post-discharge adverse events but a higher risk of behavioral changes. Phi coefficient analysis suggested clustering of adverse events, with neurologic symptoms tending to co-occur. Conclusion: Compared with the D+C regimen, the D+M regimen provides a higher first-attempt sedation success rate and fewer post-discharge adverse events, although attention to post-discharge behavioral changes remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.