ReviewInternational journal of heart failure2026
Right Heart Catheterization: Best Practices and Specific Considerations.
Review in International journal of heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right heart catheterization (RHC) remains the gold standard for the invasive assessment of cardiovascular hemodynamics, enabling direct measurement of right atrial, right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures, as well as cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Although earlier randomized trials questioned the routine use of pulmonary artery catheters in critically ill patients, RHC continues to play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension, advanced heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and complex structural or valvular heart disease. The clinical value of RHC, however, depends not only on performing the procedure but also on obtaining accurate and physiologically meaningful measurements. This review summarizes contemporary best practices for performing RHC in routine clinical practice. Key procedural considerations include defining the clinical objective prior to catheterization, selecting appropriate vascular access, ensuring correct transducer leveling and signal fidelity, and accounting for respiratory variation and hemodynamic conditions during pressure acquisition. The review also discusses methodological aspects of measuring pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, cardiac output, and intracardiac shunts, and highlights common technical pitfalls that may lead to misinterpretation of hemodynamic data. In addition, the evolving role of RHC in clinical decision-making is reviewed, including its application in the hemodynamic classification of pulmonary hypertension, vasoreactivity testing, exercise hemodynamics for suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Standardized acquisition and careful interpretation of hemodynamic data are essential to maximize the diagnostic and therapeutic value of RHC in contemporary cardiovascular practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.