Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110702›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of heart failure2026

Right Heart Catheterization: Best Practices and Specific Considerations.

Seung Hun Lee, Dae-Hwan Bae, David Hong, In Cheol Kim, Jeong Hoon Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seung Hun LeeDepartment of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-7826
Dae-Hwan BaeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Bucheon Sejong Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4464-8613
David HongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-0486
In Cheol KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-2328
Jeong Hoon YangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-1367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Right heart catheterization (RHC) remains the gold standard for the invasive assessment of cardiovascular hemodynamics, enabling direct measurement of right atrial, right ventricular, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures, as well as cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Although earlier randomized trials questioned the routine use of pulmonary artery catheters in critically ill patients, RHC continues to play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension, advanced heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and complex structural or valvular heart disease. The clinical value of RHC, however, depends not only on performing the procedure but also on obtaining accurate and physiologically meaningful measurements. This review summarizes contemporary best practices for performing RHC in routine clinical practice. Key procedural considerations include defining the clinical objective prior to catheterization, selecting appropriate vascular access, ensuring correct transducer leveling and signal fidelity, and accounting for respiratory variation and hemodynamic conditions during pressure acquisition. The review also discusses methodological aspects of measuring pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, cardiac output, and intracardiac shunts, and highlights common technical pitfalls that may lead to misinterpretation of hemodynamic data. In addition, the evolving role of RHC in clinical decision-making is reviewed, including its application in the hemodynamic classification of pulmonary hypertension, vasoreactivity testing, exercise hemodynamics for suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Standardized acquisition and careful interpretation of hemodynamic data are essential to maximize the diagnostic and therapeutic value of RHC in contemporary cardiovascular practice.

Indexed as

Cardiac catheterizationHeart failurePulmonary artery catheterizationPulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID42110702
PMCPMC13150460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.