Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42110897›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026

Construction and Verification of a Risk Prediction Model for Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Xia Luo, Xiaoling Lin, Qinghua Zhao, Shaoyu Mu, Xueying Yu, Chenyun Zhang, Duoduo Lin, Tian Zhou, Qijun Shui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xia LuoSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-386X
Xiaoling LinSchool of Nursing, Xiamen Medical College, 361023 Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-7472
Qinghua ZhaoCenter of Nursing Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 400042 Chongqing, China.
Shaoyu MuSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China.
Xueying YuDepartment of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 510630 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chenyun ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital, Xianyue Hospital Affiliated with Xiamen Medical College, Fujian Psychiatric Center, Fujian Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, 361012 Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Duoduo LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Xiamen Xianyue Hospital, Xianyue Hospital Affiliated with Xiamen Medical College, Fujian Psychiatric Center, Fujian Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, 361012 Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Tian ZhouDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 510145 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-9635
Qijun ShuiSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is closely associated with suicidal ideation (SI). The development of an effective prediction model for SI in BD patients could facilitate early risk identification in high-risk groups. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design. Patients with BD were enrolled from three tertiary hospitals between July 2021 and July 2024. All participants were randomly allocated to training (n = 204) or testing (n = 88) sets at a 7:3 ratio. A hybrid feature selection strategy integrating the data-driven Boruta algorithm with clinical expertise was used to identify potential predictors of SI. Nine machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set to construct SI prediction models. The optimal model was selected through comprehensive evaluation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and other indicators. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to rank and interpret the importance of features in the best-performing model and to assess their contributions to SI. Results: A total of 292 patients with BD were analyzed, of whom 149 (51.03%) reported SI during the past week. Among the nine models, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.915 (95% CI: 0.850-0.965), a balanced accuracy of 0.818, a sensitivity of 0.891, a specificity of 0.833, a precision of 0.826, a average precision of 0.922, an F1 score of 0.860, and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.704. The SHAP analysis revealed that quality of life was the most influential predictor, followed by the number of depressive episodes, history of suicide attempts, cognitive functioning, and emotional abuse in childhood trauma. Conclusions: RF-based models can effectively predict SI in BD patients and inform clinically targeted interventions.

Indexed as

bipolar disordermachine learningrandom forestsuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID42110897
PMCPMC13156062

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.