ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Current status and future prospects of functionalized mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal cord injury and the gut microbiota.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a critical neurological disorder characterized by intricate pathophysiological processes. The hostile local environment induced by secondary damage markedly hinders intrinsic neural repair, and currently available therapies exhibit limited clinical effectiveness. Recently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted considerable attention due to their paracrine-mediated therapeutic properties, including immunoregulatory effects, neurotrophic factor secretion, and promotion of angiogenesis. Nevertheless, conventional transplantation of MSCs encounters substantial obstacles, such as poor cellular viability post-injection, inadequate homing capabilities, and diminished therapeutic outcomes in the unfavorable post-injury microenvironment. Therefore, it is essential to "functionalize" MSCs to enhance their therapeutic potential. This article systematically reviews three major MSC functionalization strategies: biomaterial-based delivery platforms, genetic engineering approaches, and drug or physical synergistic therapies. Preclinical evidence indicates that these strategies can synergistically improve motor function recovery, promote axonal regeneration and myelination, and suppress inflammatory responses. Overall, functionalized MSC therapy shows greater therapeutic promise than traditional cell transplantation. Future studies should prioritize challenges related to safety, standardization, and large-scale production to support clinical translation, and should further explore multimodal functional integration and intelligent, responsive stem cell systems to achieve breakthroughs in SCI treatment. The translational potential of this article: This article presents a multidimensional therapeutic framework that integrates biomaterial-based delivery platforms, genetic engineering modifications, and non-invasive preconditioning methods to synergistically enhance the survival and functionality of transplanted cells within the hostile injury microenvironment. Preclinical evidence demonstrates these approaches effectively promote motor recovery, axonal regeneration, and inflammatory modulation, while preliminary clinical studies confirm their long-term safety and efficacy in improving neurological function. However, clinical translation faces challenges including the long-term safety of gene editing, standardization of treatment protocols, and the efficacy gap between animal models and human applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.