ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2026
Advances of piezoelectric biomaterials in bone defect repair: The role of direct and inverse piezoelectric effect.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From local tissue repair to systemic precision orthopaedics: recent advances in musculoskeletal regeneration and translational medicine.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Piezoelectric scaffolds for bone regeneration: a systematic review of preclinical studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural bone exhibits piezoelectric properties due to its collagen structure. Piezoelectric biomaterials, which can replicate the electromechanical behavior of bone, have thus become a key focus in the development of artificial biomaterials. Their piezoelectricity is expressed as the direct effect under mechanical stimulation and the inverse effect under electrical stimulation. Studies have shown that appropriate mechanical or electrical cues can enhance bone defect repair by activating the piezoelectric properties of these materials, influencing osteogenesis, angiogenesis, osteoclastogenesis, inflammatory responses, and neurogenesis. This review summarizes the mechanisms through which piezoelectric biomaterials facilitate bone defect repair via direct and inverse piezoelectric effects, and discusses the current challenges and future prospects for their application in accelerating bone healing. The Translational Potential of this Article. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms by which direct and inverse piezoelectric effects in piezoelectric biomaterials facilitate bone defect repair. It highlights their roles in promoting osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis, inhibiting osteoclast differentiation, and modulating inflammatory responses. These insights are critical for the development of novel piezoelectric biomaterials and the advancement of their personalized clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.