ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Label-free detection of ovarian cancer cells in ascites-related cell models using digital holographic flow cytometry.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies, frequently accompanied by ascites formation in advanced stages. Accurate identification of ovarian cancer cells within ascitic fluid is clinically important yet technically challenging due to pronounced cellular heterogeneity. Here, we establish a quantitative holographic imaging flow cytometry framework for ovarian cancer cell discrimination under ascites-mimicking conditions using single-cell phase images acquired by microfluidic digital holographic microscopy. A six-cell-type dataset was constructed to emulate the heterogeneous tumor-associated microenvironment, introducing substantial morphological and biophysical overlap. Within this unified experimental setting, we systematically compared multidimensional feature-based machine learning models with end-to-end deep learning approaches to assess their relative performance in cancer cell detection. Deep learning models demonstrated improved robustness and sensitivity in complex backgrounds while preserving high-throughput capability. This study provides a structured evaluation of quantitative phase-driven cell classification and supports the development of rapid, automated, label-free screening strategies for ascites analysis.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.