ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Pediatric pulmonary hypertension registry: Single-center experience from India.
Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare and usually irreversible disease, eventually leading to right heart failure (RHF). There are multiple PH registries in adults with PH, but very few pediatric PH registries, especially from developing countries. Methods: All children (aged 3 months-18 years) diagnosed with PH were enrolled in the study. PH was defined by standard echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization criteria. We excluded patients with transient or reversible PH, including hyperkinetic PH associated with congenital heart defects (CHDs). Results: Our registry included 100 children from June 2019 to January 2024, with an equal gender ratio (male: female = 1:1). Easy fatigability, syncope, and RHF were the most common presenting features. Only 15% of children were classified as idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension (IPH). The majority (81%) of children belonged to the CHD-pulmonary artery hypertension (CHD-PAH) group (49% Eisenmenger syndrome, 26% CHD with systemic to pulmonary shunt and severe PAH falling in the inoperable category, and 6% had post-operative residual PH). All patients in the IPH group and 42 patients (48.2%) in other PH were on pulmonary vasodilators. The median follow-up duration was 13 months (range: 4-56 months). Overall, there were 5 deaths (5% mortality), with 3 deaths in the IPH (20%) group. Children with CHD-PAH had better functional class, and no patient in this group died. Conclusions: The underlying etiology and prognosis in children with PH may differ in the Indian context compared to the Western world. Different centers across India may still face a higher proportion of unoperated CHD due to late referral, a limited number of specialized centers, and financial constraints. Children with IPH have poor long-term outcomes and a high risk of mortality. Multicenter PH registries may provide actual statistics and further insights into the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.